checkerboardprincess (
checkerboardprincess) wrote2010-11-11 03:07 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
God dammit Internet
I really didn't want to learn of some 47 year old man's attempt to sell and defend an ebook regarding the 'rules of engagement' when it comes to kiddy diddling.
I hope the FBI or whatever makes Amazon tell them who bought that ebook (if anyone did). Claiming its censorship if they didn't sell that book.. bullcrap. When you get to the size that you are Amazon... the shit you sell represents you to your consumer base. People look to you for books, dvds and generally anything but pedophilia.
Besides. Why allow it when you know it'll mean the guvaments gon be on your ass to divulge anyway!?
I don't get it.
I hope the FBI or whatever makes Amazon tell them who bought that ebook (if anyone did). Claiming its censorship if they didn't sell that book.. bullcrap. When you get to the size that you are Amazon... the shit you sell represents you to your consumer base. People look to you for books, dvds and generally anything but pedophilia.
Besides. Why allow it when you know it'll mean the guvaments gon be on your ass to divulge anyway!?
I don't get it.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The truth is, there is NO right code of conduct for that kind of interaction with children. I'm not saying adults should run when kids are present, but there should be no behaviour that involves lust or whatever. Nothing pisses me off more than people trying to harm children, and I don't even particularly like kids XD I'd never have them. And internets always seems to justify everything. So many people think loli is okay because it gives pedos an outlet!1 Yeah, better drawings than real kids, but still >:o
I think I'll make a book like that, only instead of advice to sickos, it will have a picture of Pedobear on every page.
no subject